![]() Ekstrand explained that both mis- and disinformation can include discounting and backlash of expertise-putting it at odds with expertise found in academia. “Both mis- and disinformation have implications in academia,” Ekstrand said. Royster Distinguished Professor for Graduate Education at Carolina. Tori Ekstrand (’03 Ph.D.) an associate professor in the UNC Hussman School of Journalism and Media, provided structure and insight for the trip. The sixth annual conference - the first held in person in two years - focused on the theme of mis- and disinformation, or how information spreads in a rapidly, increasingly global, communications landscape. Seven Royster Society of Fellows doctoral graduate students from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill traveled to Germany for the 2022 Royster Global Conference, an initiative of The Graduate School designed to increase awareness and understanding of graduate education across international borders. Athletics Display Sub Menu for Athletics.Life at Carolina Display Sub Menu for Life at Carolina.Gillings School of Global Public Health.Online and Distance Education Opens in new site.Academics Display Sub Menu for Academics.Campaign for Carolina Opens in new site.News and Updates Display Sub Menu for News and Updates.Branding and Identity Guidelines Opens in new site.About the University Display Sub Menu for About the University.The Court rejected the idea that courts should just presume that representation is adequate where the state law has explicitly authorized some other party to intervene in the process. The Supreme Court court means that Republican legislators in the state of North Carolina can act and advocate for a voter-identification law that they believe the state’s attorney general, a Democrat, isn’t defending adequately in court. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented. On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court reversed the Fourth Circuit in an 8–1 vote. Oral arguments were held on March 21, 2022. Supreme Court Ĭertiorari was granted in the case on November 24, 2021. The General Assembly subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari. The court of appeals granted rehearing en banc, and affirmed the district court by a 9–6 vote. The General Assembly appealed, and a divided panel of the Fourth Circuit reversed in an opinion written by Judge A. The district court denied both motions, asserting that Stein would defend the law fairly. The General Assembly sought to intervene in defense of the law twice, believing North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein was not adequately defending the law. The North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP filed suit against SB 824 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in late December 2018. In November 2018, the people of North Carolina adopted a voter identification amendment to the Constitution of North Carolina, and the General Assembly then passed SB 824 to implement the amendment in December 2018, over Cooper's veto.Īfter the HB 589 litigation, the General Assembly modified state law, again over Cooper's veto, to direct that the Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the North Carolina Senate be able to intervene in any litigation over the constitutionality of state law. ![]() A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit invalidated that law in 2016, and the Supreme Court later denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in 2017 after disputes about whether North Carolina's new governor, Roy Cooper, could withdraw the petition. In 2013, the North Carolina General Assembly passed, and Governor Pat McCrory signed, HB 589, a voter identification law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |